Categories
Archive
Latest comments
To those who have devoted their lives to dance, sometimes called dancesport, dance matters greatly. These are the people to whom the future, the needs and wishes of the dancer matter.
It is also an unfortunate fact that certain matters have divided the dance world, there are those prepared to work simply for their own power and ignoring the needs and wishes of the dancers - the people who should matter most.
This website is dedicated to all those to whom dance matters, to whom freedom matters.
Navigation:Blog / Carlos Freitag, WDSF & Competitions in England.
Carlos Freitag, WDSF & Competitions in England.
Category: Dance Morality | October 29, 2011 | Admin2
Once again we have a Press Release from Mr Freitag, WDSF President, which contains many highly questionable words.
http://www.worlddancesport.org/doc/press/2011/2011.pdf
WDSF And Competitions In England 25/10/2011
In the last twelve months, I have written to you on a number of occasions to provide you with current, accurate information about WDSF and England.
In recent times, we were optimistic because some of the distinguished people who had been active in dancing in England for years as coaches, adjudicators and producers had indicated to us a willingness to consider participating in the WDSF sporting system and build DanceSport in England within WDSF and the Olympic family.
We responded by saying in good faith that the WDSF Presidium would not take action against athletes, adjudicators and other officials who in 2011 participated in the Blackpool Festivals, the International Ballroom Championships at the Royal Albert Hall, London, and the UK Open Championships at Bournemouth, England.
We kept our word, and following commitments made by me to the 2010 and 2011 WDSF Annual General Meetings, I continued to contact the various organisers of events in England, and other prominent people in England, in order to find a working solution for the future. As I explained to you last time, the compromise WDSF has consistently proposed was to include WDSF-registered events within these competitions, so that we could encourage all athletes to attend and dance in all competitions.
WDSF continues to discuss and plan the future of DanceSport with the progressive supporters of our sport in England. We have been consulting actively with different organisers of competitions there and expect progress for WDSF in England in the near future. However, I am sorry to say that despite early promise, no constructive responses have been received.
I’m writing to you in order to clarify the situation concerning the participation of athletes, adjudicators and other officials at the Blackpool Festivals in 2012.
Further to my letter to you dated 18 March 2011, the WDSF Presidium has continued its discussions with the organisers of the Blackpool Festivals with a view to agreeing a sporting and regulatory collaboration with WDSF which would allow us to include this event in the WDSF sporting calendar. These discussions are on-going and we remain hopeful that they will ultimately result in an outcome which is beneficial to all parties and DanceSport in general.
In order to give such an outcome the greatest chance of success and considering all the sporting elements surrounding the 2012 edition of the Blackpool Festivals, the WDSF Presidium has decided (as it did in 2011) that it will not take action against athletes, adjudicators and other officials who participate in the 2012 Blackpool Festivals. Athletes, adjudicators and other officials will therefore not be required to seek consent from WDSF in order to compete in the 2012 Blackpool Festivals.
I should like to make clear that this decision is taken purely in respect of the 2012 Blackpool Festivals. It is without prejudice to subsequent editions of this event and does not provide any exception to, or relax the requirements of, the WDSF rules and regulations concerning any other non-registered events, whether in England or elsewhere. In particular, athletes and adjudicators must adhere to the strict terms of the recently revised Codes of Conduct and Standards of Ethics with respect to participation in all other non-registered events.
I again confirm that in the interests of the athletes, WDSF wishes to encourage the organisers of the UK Championships and the International Championships to find a working solution to build their events with WDSF’s full support.
We therefore confirm that we will continue to seek to establish a working relationship with the Blackpool Festivals organisers. However, we urge you to discourage your athletes and officials from participating in these Blackpool Festivals until we are able to find a working solution in the interests of all athletes, officials and DanceSport.
I hope that this letter gives you a clearer picture of WDSF’s current policy and work in England.
Yours truly,
Carlos Freitag
WDSF President.
WDSF And Competitions In England 25/10/2011
In the last twelve months, I have written to you on a number of occasions to provide you with current, accurate information about WDSF and England.
In recent times, we were optimistic because some of the distinguished people who had been active in dancing in England for years as coaches, adjudicators and producers had indicated to us a willingness to consider participating in the WDSF sporting system and build DanceSport in England within WDSF and the Olympic family.
We responded by saying in good faith that the WDSF Presidium would not take action against athletes, adjudicators and other officials who in 2011 participated in the Blackpool Festivals, the International Ballroom Championships at the Royal Albert Hall, London, and the UK Open Championships at Bournemouth, England.
We kept our word, and following commitments made by me to the 2010 and 2011 WDSF Annual General Meetings, I continued to contact the various organisers of events in England, and other prominent people in England, in order to find a working solution for the future. As I explained to you last time, the compromise WDSF has consistently proposed was to include WDSF-registered events within these competitions, so that we could encourage all athletes to attend and dance in all competitions.
WDSF continues to discuss and plan the future of DanceSport with the progressive supporters of our sport in England. We have been consulting actively with different organisers of competitions there and expect progress for WDSF in England in the near future. However, I am sorry to say that despite early promise, no constructive responses have been received.
I’m writing to you in order to clarify the situation concerning the participation of athletes, adjudicators and other officials at the Blackpool Festivals in 2012.
Further to my letter to you dated 18 March 2011, the WDSF Presidium has continued its discussions with the organisers of the Blackpool Festivals with a view to agreeing a sporting and regulatory collaboration with WDSF which would allow us to include this event in the WDSF sporting calendar. These discussions are on-going and we remain hopeful that they will ultimately result in an outcome which is beneficial to all parties and DanceSport in general.
In order to give such an outcome the greatest chance of success and considering all the sporting elements surrounding the 2012 edition of the Blackpool Festivals, the WDSF Presidium has decided (as it did in 2011) that it will not take action against athletes, adjudicators and other officials who participate in the 2012 Blackpool Festivals. Athletes, adjudicators and other officials will therefore not be required to seek consent from WDSF in order to compete in the 2012 Blackpool Festivals.
I should like to make clear that this decision is taken purely in respect of the 2012 Blackpool Festivals. It is without prejudice to subsequent editions of this event and does not provide any exception to, or relax the requirements of, the WDSF rules and regulations concerning any other non-registered events, whether in England or elsewhere. In particular, athletes and adjudicators must adhere to the strict terms of the recently revised Codes of Conduct and Standards of Ethics with respect to participation in all other non-registered events.
I again confirm that in the interests of the athletes, WDSF wishes to encourage the organisers of the UK Championships and the International Championships to find a working solution to build their events with WDSF’s full support.
We therefore confirm that we will continue to seek to establish a working relationship with the Blackpool Festivals organisers. However, we urge you to discourage your athletes and officials from participating in these Blackpool Festivals until we are able to find a working solution in the interests of all athletes, officials and DanceSport.
I hope that this letter gives you a clearer picture of WDSF’s current policy and work in England.
Yours truly,
Carlos Freitag
WDSF President.
Questions.
1. Mr Freitag writes "In the last twelve months, I have written to you on a number of occasions to provide you with current, accurate information about WDSF and England". "A number of occasions"? As the WDSF Press Archives show there was only ONE such letter!! http://www.worlddancesport.org/doc/press/2011/IDSF%20-Letter%20to%20Members,%20England%20Situation.pdf
2. The use of the word "accurate" is strange. Is Mr Freitag in the habit of giving inaccurate information? There are those who say the situation presented by Mr Freitag in his Press Release 2011/04 of 21st March was not an accurate reflection of events. There were no false rumours being spread and his public statement that members of "Freedom to Dance" were false friends to dance was not only untrue but insulting to great people who had devoted their lives to dancing. Similarly it was not helpful or constructive to use the terminology "Progressive supporters of our sport in England" thus implying any who did not grasp his ideology were backward looking and against progress.
3. Is it not contradictory even hypocrisy to include in the same Press Release the following 2 paragraphs?
Paragraph A.
In order to give such an outcome the greatest chance of success and considering all the sporting elements surrounding the 2012 edition of the Blackpool Festivals, the WDSF Presidium has decided (as it did in 2011) that it will not take action against athletes, adjudicators and other officials who participate in the 2012 Blackpool Festivals. Athletes, adjudicators and other officials will therefore not be required to seek consent from WDSF in order to compete in the 2012 Blackpool Festivals.
Paragraph B.
We therefore confirm that we will continue to seek to establish a working relationship with the Blackpool Festivals organisers. However, we urge you to discourage your athletes and officials from participating in these Blackpool Festivals until we are able to find a working solution in the interests of all athletes, officials and DanceSport.
Paragraph A.
In order to give such an outcome the greatest chance of success and considering all the sporting elements surrounding the 2012 edition of the Blackpool Festivals, the WDSF Presidium has decided (as it did in 2011) that it will not take action against athletes, adjudicators and other officials who participate in the 2012 Blackpool Festivals. Athletes, adjudicators and other officials will therefore not be required to seek consent from WDSF in order to compete in the 2012 Blackpool Festivals.
Paragraph B.
We therefore confirm that we will continue to seek to establish a working relationship with the Blackpool Festivals organisers. However, we urge you to discourage your athletes and officials from participating in these Blackpool Festivals until we are able to find a working solution in the interests of all athletes, officials and DanceSport.
4. What is WDSF position? Is Blackpool acceptable or not? Can you say you recognise the event and then ask people not to support it and retain credibility? "Clearer picture" or Fork Tongue?
5. Does this not confirm the stories that National Members are being asked to order their couples NOT to attend, and punish those who do?
Once again we have proof WDSF are NOT interested in the best for Dancersport and Dancers, WDSF power and control is the driving force to their motives. They have no interest in progress to a Free world where the Olympic Charter is honoured.
6. Is it not false that Mr Freitag writes about "good faith" in the same letter as he pens these words "so that we could encourage all athletes to attend and dance in all competitions.". This is the very last thing Mr Freitag wants.
He is determined to stop all dancers having the opportunity to dance in all competitions
5. Does this not confirm the stories that National Members are being asked to order their couples NOT to attend, and punish those who do?
Once again we have proof WDSF are NOT interested in the best for Dancersport and Dancers, WDSF power and control is the driving force to their motives. They have no interest in progress to a Free world where the Olympic Charter is honoured.
6. Is it not false that Mr Freitag writes about "good faith" in the same letter as he pens these words "so that we could encourage all athletes to attend and dance in all competitions.". This is the very last thing Mr Freitag wants.
He is determined to stop all dancers having the opportunity to dance in all competitions
7. If his words were in good faith then the solution is simple, end the ridiculous "recognized" "unrecognized" system, drop the WDSF only system and allow all dancers to compete where they wish, within the system outside the system does not matter. The dancers and the sport of competitive dance are all that should matter - if you actually do care about dancesport. Why can WDSF not drop their ridiculous search for power at all costs.
8. Mr Freitag writes:
"We have been consulting actively with different organisers of competitions there and expect progress for WDSF in England in the near future. However, I am sorry to say that despite early promise, no constructive responses have been received." A clear picture? Accurate information? Is Mr Freitag saying we can "expect progress in the near future" or is he sorry to say "no constructive responses received"?
"We have been consulting actively with different organisers of competitions there and expect progress for WDSF in England in the near future. However, I am sorry to say that despite early promise, no constructive responses have been received." A clear picture? Accurate information? Is Mr Freitag saying we can "expect progress in the near future" or is he sorry to say "no constructive responses received"?
9. Given that WDSF have said they recognise the Blackpool Dance Festival and now in his Press Release Mr Freitag asks people ro stay away does he really expect the Festival Organisers to have good will towards WDSF? Doe he expect the organisers to trust him given his actions which many would say are dishonorable?
10. Is he trying to Blackmail the Blackpool Festival organisers? Is it that he is a coward and afraid to ban the event but trying to stop people attending and asking others to do his dirty work?
11. In a free and civilised society is it not time for civilsed behaviour and respect for Human Rights, the Olympic Charter and Freedom?
